Renata protected draft pilot planning

Staff/Privacy Review Walkthrough Script

Protected, read-only spoken walkthrough for staff/privacy review of the future draft pilot packet.

This is a protected, read-only walkthrough script. It does not collect approvals, record decisions, create staff actions, write data, or enable live workflows.

Purpose

This script helps present the draft pilot evidence package, review packet summary, decision record template, activation no-go status, and safety boundaries to staff/privacy reviewers.

Estimated spoken time: 12-15 minutes. This is presentation support only; it records no approvals, stores no decisions, creates no staff actions, reads no database, writes no database, and enables no live pilot.

Current No-Go Status

Script status

read-only-walkthrough

read-only-walkthrough

Decision status

not-recorded

not-recorded

Implementation status

not-started

not-started

Live pilot decision

no-go

no-go

Approvals

not-recorded

not-recorded

Staff actions

not-created

not-created

Opening Frame

  • Renata is not asking for live pilot approval yet.
  • This review is about whether the planning package is complete enough for staff/privacy evaluation.
  • No live accounts, drafts, submissions, staff decisions, protected APIs, protected live routes, or database writes exist.
  • The current decision state is no-go.

Recommended Walkthrough Sequence

Step Route Purpose Status
1 /protected-preview/staff-privacy-review-packet-summary/ Start with the compact summary. read-only
2 /protected-preview/draft-pilot-evidence-package/ Show the full evidence package. read-only
3 /protected-preview/staff-privacy-decision-record-template/ Show the decision areas. read-only
4 /protected-preview/draft-pilot-activation-readiness/ Show that activation remains no-go. read-only
5 /protected-preview/staff-demo-walkthrough/ Use if reviewers need broader product context. read-only

Route-by-Route Talking Points

/protected-preview/staff-privacy-review-packet-summary/

Purpose: Start with the compact summary.

Presenter: Explain that this is the review map, not an approval page.

Ask: Does this summary give you enough orientation to review the packet safely?

Boundary: No approvals are collected and no decisions are recorded from this page.

/protected-preview/draft-pilot-evidence-package/

Purpose: Show the full evidence package.

Presenter: Explain what planning artifacts exist and what remains unresolved.

Ask: Which evidence category needs more detail before staff/privacy review can continue?

Boundary: The evidence package is planning-only and does not create implementation authority.

/protected-preview/staff-privacy-decision-record-template/

Purpose: Show the decision areas.

Presenter: Emphasize all defaults remain unresolved / not-approved / no-go.

Ask: Which decision area is most important to settle before implementation planning proceeds?

Boundary: The template records no approvals, stores no outcomes, and has no approval controls.

/protected-preview/draft-pilot-activation-readiness/

Purpose: Show that activation remains no-go.

Presenter: Point to the planning stack and implementation stack split before discussing next steps.

Ask: What proof would you require before this no-go status could be reconsidered?

Boundary: Activation remains blocked; no protected live routes, APIs, storage, or writes exist.

/protected-preview/staff-demo-walkthrough/

Purpose: Use if reviewers need broader product context.

Presenter: Frame the broader demo as context only, not evidence of pilot readiness.

Ask: Does the broader product context change any privacy or staff workflow concern?

Boundary: The staff demo walkthrough is planning-only and does not enable live workflows.

Reviewer Questions To Ask

  • What resident problem is this pilot trying to solve?
  • Who would be allowed to submit pull-ups?
  • Who would be allowed to submit push-ups?
  • Who can be the subject of a draft?
  • Does the subject need notification or consent?
  • Who may review drafts?
  • What content must be blocked?
  • What stays private-only?
  • What could ever appear on the Morning Sheet?
  • How long is draft content retained?
  • What gets deleted?
  • What audit metadata is necessary?
  • Is AI allowed at all for real drafts?
  • What stops the pilot if harm appears?
  • What proof is required before implementation begins?

Expected Objections and Safe Answers

This sounds like surveillance.

The current design explicitly blocks attendance tracking, participation tracking, participation analytics, scoring, ranking, compliance metrics, and resident performance dashboards.

Will staff be able to punish people through this?

No discipline automation, scoring, automatic approval/rejection, or punitive workflow is allowed.

Will real names or emails be stored?

Current planning forbids storing or exposing real names, emails, Cloudflare claims, JWTs, tokens, or raw identity headers.

Will drafts be public?

No. Morning Sheet visibility is blocked until staff review, visibility, retention, deletion, audit, consent/privacy, and approval policies are resolved.

Will AI review real drafts?

No. AI review of real drafts remains blocked unless a future explicit AI-use policy approves it.

Is this ready to launch?

No. The current status is no-go.

Safety Boundary Reminders

no approvals are recordedno decisions are storedno staff decisions are createdno database readsno database writesno live draft collectionno live submissionsno account storageno actor storageno identity captureno role assignmentno Morning Sheet placementno protected live routesno protected API routesno active migrationsno attendance trackingno participation trackingno participation analyticsno scoring/ranking/compliance metricsno OpenAI submission processing

Closing Frame

  • The review can identify missing evidence, unresolved policy questions, and safer next steps.
  • Any approval process must remain outside the app until a separately approved decision-recording system exists.
  • Live activation remains no-go until policy, technical, staff, privacy, rollback, and small-pilot gates are satisfied.
  • The next planning phase may map possible unresolved outcomes into planning lanes without generating files, creating downloads, recording approvals, or enabling live workflows.

Next Planning Phase

Phase 10.21 — Staff/Privacy Review Packet Handoff Freeze, Planning Only

The walkthrough script is part of the current staff/privacy review packet path with print style boundaries, manual assembly, visual QA, staff handoff, dry-run, debrief, evidence gap register, evidence gap review sequence, question bank, and meeting agenda planned. The next planning phase may map possible unresolved outcomes into planning lanes without generating PDFs, creating downloads, recording approvals, reading databases, writing databases, adding protected routes, adding protected APIs, or enabling live workflows.

Boundaries: no export generation; no download artifacts; no approval recording; no decision storage; no live pilot; no protected live routes; no protected API routes; no database reads; no database writes; no active migrations; no draft storage; no account storage; no actor storage; no identity capture; no staff decisions; no Morning Sheet placement; no tracking; no analytics; no scoring.

recommended-next