Renata protected review packet planning

Staff/Privacy Review Gate Criteria Matrix, Planning Only

Protected, read-only gate criteria matrix for outside-app planning. It is a static reference page, not a gate approval tool, gate closure tracker, decision record, outcome tracker, workflow system, readiness approval, assignment queue, or task system.

Purpose

Organize non-live staff/privacy gate criteria that would need outside-app review before any future implementation planning, without evaluating real gate status, approving gates, closing gates, authorizing readiness, capturing evidence, routing workflows, assigning tasks, storing outcomes, or recording decisions.

Current Gate Criteria Boundary

Intended Audience

operatorprogram-leadprivacy-ownerclinical-or-program-reviewertechnical-ownerstaff-review-leadobserver-note-taker

Role labels only. No staff names, resident names, emails, contact details, attendee lists, participant lists, or identity details are included.

Source Pages

Gate Criteria Groups

Static Gate Criteria Matrix

Sufficiency Guidance

  • Sufficiency is determined outside the app by the responsible role label and decision authority.
  • Sufficient evidence identifies an owner role, decision category, privacy boundary, implementation implication, rollback or incident consequence where relevant, and no sensitive personal details.
  • A criterion is not sufficient if it only says staff should decide later, implies launch, includes real people or draft content, relies on AI-generated policy judgment, or is captured only inside the app.
  • No sufficiency finding is stored, scored, closed, approved, or recorded in the app.

Insufficiency Guidance

missing owner rolemissing decision authorityunclear privacy boundaryunclear storage permissionunclear private-only versus Morning Sheet visibility boundarymissing retention/deletion consequencemissing audit/minimization consequencemissing rollback or incident consequencecontains sensitive personal detailscaptured only inside the app

Non-Eligible Evidence

real resident datareal staff dataemailsCloudflare Access claimsJWTstokensraw identity headersreal draft bodiesprivate feedbackstaff notesmedical detailslegal detailsinsurance detailstrauma detailssubstance-use disclosures from residentsattendance dataparticipation dataresident performance judgmentsclinical claimsAI analysis of real drafts

If any of these appear in real review material, they cannot count as gate evidence inside the app.

Outside-App Documentation Guidance

  • Document any gate discussion outside the app only.
  • Use role labels, not real person names.
  • Do not copy gate evidence, outcomes, notes, answers, names, draft content, or sensitive details into the app.
  • Treat this matrix as static planning reference, not a gate tracker, approval record, readiness checklist, workflow router, assignment queue, or task board.
  • Future planning prompts may be drafted only after outside-app review and must remain planning-only until separately approved.

What Not To Document

real resident datareal staff dataemailsCloudflare Access claimsJWTstokensraw identity headersreal draft bodiesprivate feedbackstaff notesmedical detailslegal detailsinsurance detailstrauma detailssubstance-use disclosures from residentsattendance dataparticipation dataresident performance judgmentsclinical claimsAI analysis of real draftsquestion answersmeeting minutesattendee listsparticipant listsgate statusgate closurereadiness approvalimplementation authorizationofficial approval decisionsofficial rejection decisionsoutcome recordsassignment recordstask recordsworkflow routing records

Stop Conditions

  • reviewer asks to enter notes into the app
  • reviewer asks to store gate evidence in the app
  • reviewer asks to approve or close a gate in the app
  • reviewer asks to mark readiness in the app
  • reviewer asks to record approval or decision in the app
  • reviewer asks to enter real names, emails, drafts, staff notes, or sensitive details
  • reviewer suggests protected APIs, protected live routes, database reads, database writes, workflow routing, tracking, scoring, or Morning Sheet placement can begin
  • reviewer treats a static criterion as implementation authorization
  • reviewer treats a planning lane as a live workflow queue

Conversion Rules For Future Planning Phases

  • a gate concern may become a future planning prompt only after outside-app review
  • no gate concern becomes implementation authorization
  • no gate concern becomes a gate approval record
  • no gate concern becomes a gate closure record
  • no gate concern becomes a readiness approval record
  • no gate concern becomes an outcome, decision, assignment, task, workflow, storage, database table, route, API, migration, read, write, or live workflow
  • policy gate concerns must remain planning-only until policy review is complete
  • privacy gate concerns must remain planning-only until privacy review is complete
  • staff workflow gate concerns must remain planning-only until staff workflow review is complete
  • technical gate concerns must remain planning-only until technical review and explicit approval are complete
  • stop-condition gate concerns keep implementation blocked

What Remains Blocked

no collection surfacesno entry controlsno long-text entry controlsno selection controlsno action controlsno exportsno downloadsno database readsno database writesno protected API routesno protected live routesno active migrationsno OpenAI submission processingno identity captureno account storageno actor storageno staff decisionsno trackingno analyticsno scoringno attendance captureno meeting-minutes storageno outcome storageno gate approvalno gate closureno gate status trackingno gate evidence captureno gate evidence storageno readiness approvalno implementation authorizationno assignment creationno task creationno workflow routingno approval recordingno decision recordingno note captureno observation storageno evidence-gap storageno review-finding storageno question-answer storageno Morning Sheet placementno participation trackingno participation analytics

Recommended Next Phase